Rashad Ali on Islamist extremism
Interview with ABC News Australia host Emma Alberici
Originally found on YouTube here: https://youtu.be/PO9J_4OqnsU?si=aH9VIUZTpI3JTtsN
The upload date is June 29, 2015 which is likely close to the broadcast date as the journalist appears to reference a terror attack committed June 26, 2015: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/26/one-dead-in-attack-on-french-factory
Rashad Ali, welcome to the program good
afternoon a significant event as you
have heard his unfolding in France would
you like to make a comment about that
well I think it's a continued attack on
European soil I think also with the
chosen factory appears to be an attack
on a Western specifically American
interest and I guess it's part of a
pattern and unfortunately I think we're
only seeing the beginning of I think it
will continue and arguably there'll be
more events like this why do you say
that I think because we're where the
moment we're dealing really with you
know only the the peripheral elements of
some of the the wider Islamist attacks
that are happening across Europe we saw
what happened with Charlie Hebdo we saw
similar incident in Copenhagen in
Denmark we saw smaller events take place
in Germany etc and I think with the
literally thousands of individuals that
have left from Europe to go and join
Isis I think we may see similar attacks
like this and of this nature what does
lead someone to become so radicalized
that they would involve themselves in
such a brutal strike well I think
sometimes we miss historical context I
think it's very difficult for us to
understand incidents like this in
individuals like this but if we step
back maybe maybe 30 or 40 40 years or so
across the end of the 60s and the 70s we
had similar quite extreme left-wing
groups like the Red Army fraction which
had embraced a very anti-establishment
anti-western anti-capitalist narrative
coupled it with a very extreme form of
marxist communism and left ideology
which they believed was a tactical means
to bringing about a utopia in that sense
it's very similar to what we're seeing
with Isis it's similar to the tactics
that are utilized by al-qaeda it's
similar to the very extreme Islamist
groups that have this
utopianism estate which they've
established in Iraq and Syria and want
to spread across the globe as an
alternative to capitalism the difference
is this is one there's inspired by a
very narrow reading of religious
scripture combined with totalitarian
ideology Russia Valley your story is one
of a former leader of an Islamic
extremist group who's now called on to
address the UK Parliament you're a
prominent university lecturer before we
talk about your transition specifically
tell us first why you were a member of
his butt to rear well I think like a lot
of the kind of radical groups that
operate specifically within the
Islamists seen people are attracted to a
number of things first of all I think
the the nature of the world is that we
will always have problems in the world
whether these are political economic
social and therefore they tend to
utilize those grievances to form a
narrative so whether it's the issue in
Palestine weather is when I was growing
at the Bosnian situation whether it was
ongoing problems in Kashmir Indian
subcontinent all of these political
problems form a very simplistic
narrative which is you have the evil
Western hegemony over the over the globe
you have the Muslim diaspora across the
entire across the entirety of the Muslim
majority countries which are politically
disenfranchised they have lost all
political will and political power
because there is no singular unifying
body if only the muslim-majority
countries can be unified under religious
political leadership which they win or
call a Caliphate which were seeing the
beginnings the bird joining state within
seryn Iraq they'd be able to unify
resources energy power ability military
might and have this kind of very extreme
alternative to capitalism where liberal
values democracy and human rights are
replaced by enforcing one narrow reading
of what people see is or what they claim
to be religious law as the state law and
so they see that as a means of unifying
people together to stand up to Western
hegemony and so all those things come
together identity a sense of belonging a
sense of political purpose
and a manipulation of religious feelings
and religious beliefs that all come
together to provide a very powerful
narrative in that sense I guess people
will work towards there whether it's
politically whether it's through radical
militant activity or whether is by
entering the political processes to
bring about a political change but I'm
very curious about your individual
experience because it's not often we get
to speak to someone who's come sort of
full circle you were only 15 years old
was that what was attracting new back
then to his but tahrir sure I mean sure
I think I guess I was explained as the
number of things first is growing up in
you know I grew up in Sheffield which is
a city in the north of England and it's
an old industrial city it was a very
left-wing city so I grew up in an
atmosphere which is fairly normally
anti-establishment the difference was I
guess I grew up with in coming from a
Muslim heritage in a Muslim background
and what attracted me to Hezbollah area
was that it changed from being me from
being a minority group that was growing
up in a society which I didn't you know
I shared general attributes and belonged
to it in a broad sense but I had this
ever so slight difference and that was
my identity as being a Muslim this was
then captured and blown out on a number
of levels first intellectually that
actually I wasn't part of a minority
religion that didn't belong I was part
of this global Muslim Diaspora that was
1.5 billion people that actually I had
an intellectual belief system one that
was rested upon a sound logic a sound
rational belief in God a sound rational
belief in the divine system of Islam and
as far as they're concerned Islam is not
a religion or a different religious
right or in fact this vast
civilisational culture and history Islam
is a very narrow simplistic political
ideology and they put that in contrast
to capitalism and socialism so someone
who was growing up who's interested in
politics and economics they kind of
explained it as well the alternative to
the failed communism
of the 80s with the end of the Russian
state and the failure of market
economics that actually we all see the
problems in the world resulted from
market economics whether it's third
world debt whether it's you know the
poverty-stricken countries or whether
it's disparity within the advanced world
that actually what they had was a very
simple narrative that Islam has a
thirteen hundred year-old civilizational
economic political alternative that was
ended by the Crusaders at the 1924 with
the destruction of the Ottoman state so
actually what you had is that I guess
capturing those political aspirations
the identity politics an aspect of
religious identity putting it together
in a way that captures young people that
makes them feel confident about their
belief that makes them feel that they
belong to a global Muslim population
there's 1.5 billion people that makes
them believe that they actually possess
solutions to economic social political
problems then actually the way they view
the world as the Western evils these
evils you know can be stopped whether
its destruction of the State of Israel
occupying muslim-majority countries I
Palestinian territory well there is the
Gulf Wars only Western powers are
undertaking war etc sorry these are a
very simple political religious
alternative let me just interrupt you to
ask you what it was about the group that
then turned you off well actually as you
can probably tell the narrative is a
it's it's a moral because it takes you
away from having a natural sense of
right and wrong to rejecting your
natural moral moral compass if you like
and only having a fiddy istic very we
obey what God says and what God says is
what the group tells you is God's
commands and prohibitions ie it's the
ideology and so once you realize this
you start to realize actually this is
just not bad in the sense that they are
ill motives because they they use very
noble motives but actually it's bad in
the sense it's immoral secondly you
start to realize that actually the group
itself is not puritanical it doesn't
belong to the kind of fundamentalist
Saudi Salafi narrative of religion but
it's ideologically extreme but in that
sense it recognizes that Islam for 1400
years has had vast different
interpretations on almost every
issue religion on how we pray how we
fast in fact on every question of
religious law with us on things like
abortions were things like treaties and
politics Muslims have had different
religious positions different cultural
history different politics and so when
you realize this you come to the
recognition that actually Islam is a
very diverse religious tradition and
what they're just trying to impose is
their narrow political reading and the
final thing is it's actually just very
ludicrous the idea that one man should
impose his and it's always the man his
interpretation of religion across the
globe as part of the Supreme hegemonic
state solve the world's problems you
only really buy that if you think God
has told you to do so because it's such
an irrational dogma so I don't want to
run out of it i believe the dogma sorry
i don't want to run out of time but i do
want to get your view on a new set of
legislation that's been introduced in
our country that would give the
government power to revoke the
citizenship of dual nationals who fight
alongside terrorist groups in the Middle
East I want to know what you think of
that in terms of a way to prevent terror
activity coming to Australia well I
think I think a few things first of all
it's not going to stop individuals who
are seeking to leave the country we've
already had the rhetoric and we're going
to arrest you if you return etc the
people seeking to leave the country go
with the view of never returning back to
join this caliphate to join this in a
utopian state and be part of its us the
first thing I don't think it's going to
work as a deterrent regarding the people
there return we have to be really have
to be realistic the people who are
returning and not necessarily people
they've gone and joined Isis these are
people who may have gone initially with
a view of supporting the opposition to
the Assad regime some of them have been
disgusted by what they've seen in our
returning back to Europe and therefore a
lot of them are not necessarily the
greatest threat they were going to be
dealing with at the same time we have to
be realistic about the fact that they do
pose a threat and therefore we need to
assess engage and i would suggest think
of the best way to reintegrate d
radicalize these individuals because we
already have programs running on how to
you know remove the grievance narrative
how
to engage with them on a
religio-political level so that actually
there push pull their motives for
undertaking terrorist acts can be
addressed and they can be reintegrated
into wider society I don't believe just
you know taking away their citizenship
and leaving them to join another country
a will resolve the security problem
because actually it doesn't mean that
they have no connection back to
Australia or the west and therefore it
doesn't necessarily resolve that it's
also passing the problem on to another
country as opposed to dealing with a
problem that to some extent we've
incubated and created in the West so I
think we need to think about that on a
human rights level I think de facto even
if it isn't taking away this they've
been making them stateless I think
effectively we may be sending them to
countries where the human rights records
are quite appalling as well and that for
me poses a moral and ethical challenge
that I think we have to think about very
seriously Russia Delhi you've given us a
lot of things to think about thank you
very much for your time this evening
Comments
Post a Comment